From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Air Stream Corp. v. 3300 Lawson Corp.

Court of Appeals of New York
Apr 3, 2012
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 2420 (N.Y. 2012)

Opinion

No. 116 SSM 8

04-03-2012

Air Stream Corp., Appellant, v. 3300 Lawson Corp., Respondent.

Submitted by Floyd G. Grossman, for appellant. Submitted by Linda S. Agnew, for respondent.


Submitted by Floyd G. Grossman, for appellant.

Submitted by Linda S. Agnew, for respondent.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order reversed, with costs, and case remitted to the Appellate Division, Second Department, for further proceedings in accordance with the principles of law expressed in Estate of Becker v Murtagh (___ NY3d ___ [2012] [decided today]). Because the legal standards Supreme Court employed were consonant with our decision in Becker, we remit to the Appellate Division rather than Supreme Court. Thus, the Appellate Division, in reviewing Supreme Court's judgment, should now apply the facts of this case to the law as expressed in Becker.

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur.

Decided April 3, 2012


Summaries of

Air Stream Corp. v. 3300 Lawson Corp.

Court of Appeals of New York
Apr 3, 2012
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 2420 (N.Y. 2012)
Case details for

Air Stream Corp. v. 3300 Lawson Corp.

Case Details

Full title:Air Stream Corp., Appellant, v. 3300 Lawson Corp., Respondent.

Court:Court of Appeals of New York

Date published: Apr 3, 2012

Citations

2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 2420 (N.Y. 2012)