Aiken v. Doe

Full title: WARREN J. AIKEN, JR, Plaintiff, v. JOHN DOE, et al., Defendants

Court: United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Gainesville Division

Date published: Nov 1, 2005

Case No. 1:05-cv-00123-MP-AK (N.D. Fla. Nov. 1, 2005)

Opinion

Case No. 1:05-cv-00123-MP-AK.

November 1, 2005

ORDER

MAURICE PAUL, Senior District Judge

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 3, Report and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge, recommending that Plaintiff's action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Doc. 1, be transferred to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Jacksonville Division. The Magistrate Judge filed the Report and Recommendation on Wednesday, September 14, 2005. The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections. Pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), this Court must make a de novo review of those portions to which an objection has been made. In this instance, however, no objections were made. Therefore, having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be ADOPTED.

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Plaintiff's claim shall be transferred to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Jacksonville Division, for all further proceedings.

DONE AND ORDERED.