Ahmed v. Miller

3 Citing cases

  1. Iqbal v. Blinken

    2:23-cv-01299-KJM-CSK (E.D. Cal. Aug. 22, 2024)   Cited 2 times

    Id.See, e.g., Elhabash v. U.S. Dep't of State, No. 09-5847, 2010 WL 1742116, at *3 (DNJ Apr. 27,2010) (case moot when Embassy refused visa); Ahmedv. Miller, No. 19-11138, 2020 WL 3250214, at *2, 7 (E.D. Mich. June 16, 2020), aff'dsub nom. Baaghil v. Miller, 1 F.4th 427 (6th Cir. 2021) (claims moot when visa refused but file placed in administrative proceeding); Conley v. U.S. Dep't of State, No. 24-10131, 2024 WL 1640074, at *4 (D. Mass. Apr. 16, 2024) (noting split and finding claim for unreasonable delay moot once consular officer refused visa application). “When a visa application has been properly completed and executed before a consular officer . . ., the consular officer must issue the visa, refuse the visa under INA 212(a) or 221(g) or other applicable law or, pursuant to an outstanding order under INA 243(d), discontinue granting the visa.”

  2. Stone v. Blinken

    2:23-cv-12181 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 26, 2024)   Cited 1 times

    Once a petition is filed, USCIS initiates an investigation of the facts in the petition. Ahmed v. Miller, No. 19-11138, 2020 WL 3250214, *3 (E.D. Mich. June 16, 2020).

  3. Igal v. The U.S. Consulate Gen. in Johannesburg

    Civil Action 2:23-cv-4160 (S.D. Ohio Jun. 7, 2024)   Cited 3 times

    The United States Citizenship and Immigration Service (USCIS) of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) then arranges an investigation of the facts in the petition. Ahmed v. Miller, No. 19-11138, 2020 WL 3250214, at *3 (E.D. Mich. June 16, 2020).