From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ahmed v. Carrington Mortg.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Dec 9, 2020
189 A.D.3d 960 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)

Opinion

2017–04122 Index No. 15575/13

12-09-2020

Lofty Rashed AHMED, respondent, v. CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES, LLC, appellant, et al., defendant.

Knuckles Komosinski & Manfro, LLP, Elmsford, N.Y. (John E. Brigandi of counsel), for appellant. Clark's Laws, P.C., Babylon, N.Y. (Adam Crowley of counsel), for respondent.


Knuckles Komosinski & Manfro, LLP, Elmsford, N.Y. (John E. Brigandi of counsel), for appellant.

Clark's Laws, P.C., Babylon, N.Y. (Adam Crowley of counsel), for respondent.

WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P., SHERI S. ROMAN, SYLVIA O. HINDS–RADIX, FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract and violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act ( 15 USC § 1681 et seq. ), the defendant Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC, appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Joseph A. Santorelli, J.), dated February 17, 2017. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied those branches of the motion of the defendant Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC, which were for summary judgment dismissing the causes of action to recover damages for breach of contract and violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act, granted that branch of the plaintiff's cross motion which was for summary judgment on the issue of liability on the breach of contract cause of action, and, in effect, searched the record and awarded summary judgment to the plaintiff on the issue of liability on the Fair Credit Reporting Act cause of action.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The appeal from the order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action (see Matter of Aho, 39 N.Y.2d 241, 248, 383 N.Y.S.2d 285, 347 N.E.2d 647 ). The issues raised on the appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment (see CPLR 5501[a][1] ).

MASTRO, J.P., ROMAN, HINDS–RADIX and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ahmed v. Carrington Mortg.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Dec 9, 2020
189 A.D.3d 960 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
Case details for

Ahmed v. Carrington Mortg.

Case Details

Full title:Lofty Rashed Ahmed, respondent, v. Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

Date published: Dec 9, 2020

Citations

189 A.D.3d 960 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
189 A.D.3d 960
2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 7336

Citing Cases

Bank of N.Y. Mellon v. Singh

The defendant appeals. " ‘The doctrine of the law of the case seeks to prevent relitigation of issues of law…

Unger v. Ganci

We therefore modify the judgment by dismissing the first counterclaim. We likewise agree with plaintiff that…