A.H. v. C.M., 58 A.3d 823, 825 (Pa. Super. 2012).
A.H. v. C.M., 58 A.3d 823, 825 (Pa. Super. 2012).
A.H. v. C.M., 58 A.3d 823, 825 (Pa. Super. 2012).
To deny a party the right to a de novo hearing denies that party due process. A.H. v. C.M., 58 A.3d 823, 827 (Pa. Super. 2012).
Ketterer v. Seifert, 902 A.2d 533, 540 (Pa. Super. 2006) (quoting Jackson v. Beck, 858 A.2d 1250, 1254 (Pa. Super. 2004)). A.H. v. C.M., 58 A.3d 823, 825 (Pa. Super. 2012). Moreover, "[w]hen a trial court orders a form of custody, the best interest of the child is paramount."
Ketterer v. Seifert , 902 A.2d 533, 540 (Pa. Super. 2006) (quoting Jackson v. Beck , 858 A.2d 1250, 1254 (Pa. Super. 2004) ). A.H. v. C.M. , 58 A.3d 823, 825 (Pa. Super. 2012). Moreover, "[w]hen a trial court orders a form of custody, the best interest of the child is paramount."
Ketterer v. Seifert, 902 A.2d 533, 540 (Pa. Super. 2006) (quoting Jackson v. Beck, 858 A.2d 1250, 1254 (Pa. Super. 2004)).A.H. v. C.M., 58 A.3d 823, 825 (Pa. Super. 2012). The primary concern in any custody case is the best interests of the child.
Yates v. Yates, 963 A.2d 535, ¶ 13-15 (Pa.Super.2008). {¶15} In A.H. v. C.M., 58 A.3d 823, 824 (Pa.Super.2012), the mother filed an objection to the parenting coordinator's decision and requested a de novo hearing before the trial court. At the time, Pennsylvania provided for parenting coordination by local rule, similar to Ohio.Id. at 826.
Ketterer v. Seifert, 902 A.2d 533, 540 (Pa. Super. 2006) (quoting Jackson v. Beck, 858 A.2d 1250, 1254 (Pa. Super. 2004)).A.H. v. C.M., 58 A.3d 823, 825 (Pa. Super. 2012). The primary concern in any custody case is the best interests of the child.
Ketterer v. Seifert, 902 A.2d 533, 540 (Pa. Super. 2006) (quoting Jackson v. Beck, 858 A.2d 1250, 1254 (Pa. Super. 2004)).A.H. v. C.M., 58 A.3d 823, 825 (Pa. Super. 2012). The primary concern in any custody case is the best interests of the child.