From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Aguirre v. Dyer

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
May 24, 2007
233 F. App'x 365 (5th Cir. 2007)

Summary

holding that an inmate failed to exhaust where he failed to file a step-two grievance because his step one was referred to the Internal Affairs Division

Summary of this case from Rosa v. Littles

Opinion

No. 05-41345, Summary Calendar.

May 24, 2007.

David Aguirre, Richmond, TX, pro se.

Cynthia L., Alexander, Office of the Attorney General for the State of Texas, Austin, TX, for Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, USDC No. 1:02-CV-5.

Before REAVLEY, GARZA and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.


David Aguirre, Texas prisoner # 899858, appeals the summary judgment dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Finding no error we affirm.

We review the grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same standard as the district court. Mississippi River Basin Alliance v. Westphal, 230 F.3d 170, 174 (5th Cir. 2000). A prisoner who wishes to file a § 1983 suit for damages against prison officials must exhaust administrative remedies before doing so. 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a); Johnson v. Johnson, 385 F.3d 503, 515 (5th Cir. 2004). The Texas Department of Justice-Correctional Institutions Division provides a two-step process for filing grievances. Johnson, 385 F.3d at 515. A prisoner must pursue a grievance through both steps to satisfy the exhaustion requirement. Id. Although Aguirre filed a Step 1 grievance, he conceded that he did not file a proper Step 2 grievance. Thus, he did not exhaust his remedies.

Aguirre's contention that he was not required to file a Step 2 grievance because his Step 1 grievance was referred to the Internal Affairs Division is without merit. See Crain v. Prasifka, 97 S.W.3d 867, 870 (Tex.Ct.App. 2003). Aguirre's ignorance of the rules requiring a Step 2 grievance does not excuse his noncompliance. See Fisher v. Johnson, 174 F.3d 710, 714 (5th Cir. 1999).

Because we conclude that the magistrate judge did not err in concluding that Aguirre failed to exhaust his administrative remedies, we need not consider Aguirre's claims regarding verbal abuse and threats. See Ballard v. Burton, 444 F.3d 391, 401-02 (5th Cir. 2006) (this court may affirm summary judgment on any grounds supported by the record).

For the foregoing reasons, the judgment dismissing Aguirre's complaint for failure to exhaust administrative remedies is AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Aguirre v. Dyer

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
May 24, 2007
233 F. App'x 365 (5th Cir. 2007)

holding that an inmate failed to exhaust where he failed to file a step-two grievance because his step one was referred to the Internal Affairs Division

Summary of this case from Rosa v. Littles

holding that the plaintiff's "ignorance of the rules requiring a Step 2 grievance [did] not excuse his noncompliance."

Summary of this case from Johnson v. Madison Parish Det. Ctr.
Case details for

Aguirre v. Dyer

Case Details

Full title:David AGUIRRE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Paul DYER, Jr., Corrections…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: May 24, 2007

Citations

233 F. App'x 365 (5th Cir. 2007)

Citing Cases

Tomplait v. Jones

The Fifth Circuit consistently has held that an inmate's ignorance of a prison's grievance procedures does…

Tilmon v. Soignier

The Fifth Circuit consistently has held that an inmate's ignorance of a prison's grievance procedures does…