From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Agribank, FCB v. Blankenship

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Southern Division
Jul 27, 1999
1 S.W.3d 594 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999)

Opinion

No. ED74633

Filed: July 27, 1999 Motion for Rehearing and\or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied September 14, 1999 Application for Transfer Denied October 26, 1999

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cape Girardeau County, Honorable John W. Grimm.

James E. Spain, Poplar Bluff, Gerald Leon Warren, Clayton, for appellant.

Robert P. Schmidt, St. Louis, for respondent.

Before: Mary Rhodes Russell, P.J., Lawrence G. Crahan, J., and Lawrence E. Mooney, J.



ORDER


Debtors appeal from the trial court's granting of summary judgment in favor of bank in its petition to recover on a promissory note. No error of law appears. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value.

However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Agribank, FCB v. Blankenship

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Southern Division
Jul 27, 1999
1 S.W.3d 594 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999)
Case details for

Agribank, FCB v. Blankenship

Case Details

Full title:AGRIBANK, FCB, PLAINTIFF/RESPONDENT, v. LOICY J. BLANKENSHIP AND MARY E…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Southern Division

Date published: Jul 27, 1999

Citations

1 S.W.3d 594 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999)