From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Agress v. Turkmenilli

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 17, 1952
103 N.E.2d 900 (N.Y. 1952)

Opinion

Argued December 6, 1951

Decided January 17, 1952

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, HAMMER, J.

Arthur Karger and Rudolph L. Cherurg for appellant.

Albert Adams for respondents.


In each proceeding: Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, DYE and FROESSEL, JJ. LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., and FULD, J., dissent on the ground that plaintiffs waived their rights under the arbitration clause in prosecuting their action against the defendant as they did.


Summaries of

Agress v. Turkmenilli

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 17, 1952
103 N.E.2d 900 (N.Y. 1952)
Case details for

Agress v. Turkmenilli

Case Details

Full title:LEO AGRESS et al., Copartners Doing Business under the Name of AGRESS NUT…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jan 17, 1952

Citations

103 N.E.2d 900 (N.Y. 1952)
103 N.E.2d 900

Citing Cases

Lynch, Pierce, Fenner Smith v. Griesenbeck

The mere fact that this order was made on a motion in a pending action does not impair its finality. (See…