From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Agrawal v. Montemagno

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Apr 10, 2013
Case No. 1:10-cv-766 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 10, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 1:10-cv-766

04-10-2013

DHARMA P. AGRAWAL, Plaintiff, v. CARLO MONTEMAGNO, et al., Defendants.


Beckwith, J.

Litkovitz, M.J.


ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the status report of the parties (attached hereto) on plaintiff's pending motion for sanctions based on defendants' alleged failure to provide complete discovery (Doc. 51). Plaintiff has requested an extension of time of 30 days to attempt to resolve the matter with defendants. The request is granted and the parties are ordered to advise the Court by May 10, 2013 whether the motion will be withdrawn or requires a ruling.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________

Karen L. Litkovitz

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Agrawal v. Montemagno

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Apr 10, 2013
Case No. 1:10-cv-766 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 10, 2013)
Case details for

Agrawal v. Montemagno

Case Details

Full title:DHARMA P. AGRAWAL, Plaintiff, v. CARLO MONTEMAGNO, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Apr 10, 2013

Citations

Case No. 1:10-cv-766 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 10, 2013)