From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Agency v. White

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jun 11, 2013
2:13-cv-339-KJM-EFB PS (E.D. Cal. Jun. 11, 2013)

Opinion


CALIFORNIA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT E. WHITE, III, Defendant. No. 2:13-cv-339-KJM-EFB PS United States District Court, E.D. California. June 11, 2013

          ORDER

          KIMBERLY J. MUELLER, District Judge.

         On February 27, 2013, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Defendant filed objections on March 12, 2013, and they were considered by the undersigned.

         In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper analysis.

         Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

         1. The Findings and Recommendations filed February 27, 2013, are ADOPTED; and

         2. The above-captioned case is REMANDED to the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of Sacramento.


Summaries of

Agency v. White

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jun 11, 2013
2:13-cv-339-KJM-EFB PS (E.D. Cal. Jun. 11, 2013)
Case details for

Agency v. White

Case Details

Full title:CALIFORNIA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT E. WHITE, III…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Jun 11, 2013

Citations

2:13-cv-339-KJM-EFB PS (E.D. Cal. Jun. 11, 2013)