From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Afridonidze v. Fox Communications

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 28, 1998
253 A.D.2d 833 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

September 28, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Thomas, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that triable issues of fact exist as to whether the dog which bit the plaintiff had a vicious propensity and whether the defendants had knowledge of such a propensity ( see, Althoff v. Lefebvre, 240 A.D.2d 604).

Mangano, P. J., Miller, Pizzuto and Krausman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Afridonidze v. Fox Communications

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 28, 1998
253 A.D.2d 833 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Afridonidze v. Fox Communications

Case Details

Full title:RAFAEL AFRIDONIDZE, Respondent, v. FOX COMMUNICATIONS OF N.Y. INC. et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 28, 1998

Citations

253 A.D.2d 833 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
678 N.Y.S.2d 499