From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

African Owl Shipping Co. v. Tiryaki Shipping FZE

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Apr 8, 2022
2:22-cv-00586 JAM JDP (E.D. Cal. Apr. 8, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-00586 JAM JDP

04-08-2022

African Owl Shipping Co. Ltd. as owner pro hac vice of the M/V AFRICAN OWL IMO 9701255, Plaintiff, v. Tiryaki Shipping FZE, a foreign entity organized under the laws of the United Arab Emirates, Tiryaki Holding A.S. a foreign entity organized under the laws of the Republic of Turkey, TOI Commodities SA, a foreign entity organized under the laws of the Switzerland, Sunrise Foods International Inc. a foreign entity organized under the laws of Canada, Caprock Land Co. a New Mexico corporation, Whitechart Ltd. a foreign entity organized under the laws of Belize. Defendants.

ELLEN E. McGLYNN, State Bar No. 270367 ZACHARY J. FARLEY, State Bar No. 245355 COLLIER WALSH NAKAZAWA LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff African Owl Shipping Co. Ltd. as owner pro hac vice of the M/V AFRICAN OWL


IN ADMIRALTY

ELLEN E. McGLYNN, State Bar No. 270367

ZACHARY J. FARLEY, State Bar No. 245355

COLLIER WALSH NAKAZAWA LLP

Attorneys for Plaintiff African Owl Shipping Co. Ltd. as owner pro hac vice of the M/V AFRICAN OWL

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR INTERPLEADER AND DISCHARGE OF CARGO

THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Plaintiff African Owl Shipping Co. Ltd. (“African Owl”) has applied for: a judgement ordering the Defendants in this matter to interplead and settle among themselves their conflict related to the ownership of soybean meal carried by African Owl's vessel (the “Cargo”), an order restraining and enjoining Defendants from pursuing any actions against African Owl and its vessels or other property arising from their ownership dispute over the soybean meal, or any other cargo onboard the vessel, at issue in this action, an order permitting African Owl to discharge the disputed soybean meal to a bonded warehouse as scheduled. The Court has considered the evidence presented on behalf of African Owl in support of its application and has concluded that this is a proper case for granting the requested relief.

It is hereby ORDERED that Defendants interplead and resolve their dispute regarding ownership of the Cargo and other disputed cargo aboard Plaintiff's vessel M/V AFRICAN OWL (“Vessel”).

It is further ORDERED that Defendants are restrained from commencing any action against Plaintiff African Owl Shipping Co. Ltd. relating to the delivery or ownership of the Cargo or other disputed cargo aboard the Vessel.

It is further ORDERED that Defendants are enjoined from arresting or attaching Plaintiff African Owl's Vessel, or any other vessel owned or controlled by African Owl, or any other asset of African Owl, without limitation, in reference to the subject matter of this action.

It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff African Owl is permitted to discharge the Cargo into a bonded warehouse located in Stockton, California.


Summaries of

African Owl Shipping Co. v. Tiryaki Shipping FZE

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Apr 8, 2022
2:22-cv-00586 JAM JDP (E.D. Cal. Apr. 8, 2022)
Case details for

African Owl Shipping Co. v. Tiryaki Shipping FZE

Case Details

Full title:African Owl Shipping Co. Ltd. as owner pro hac vice of the M/V AFRICAN OWL…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Apr 8, 2022

Citations

2:22-cv-00586 JAM JDP (E.D. Cal. Apr. 8, 2022)