From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

AETNA MAINTENANCE CORP. v. LA BAFF

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Nov 29, 1979
377 So. 2d 53 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

Opinion

No. QQ-43.

November 29, 1979.

Appeal from the Judge of Industrial Claims, Arthur S. Seppi.

Frank G. Cibula, Jr., West Palm Beach, for appellants.

K.P. Jones, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.


Employer/carrier appeals from a worker's compensation order dated October 23, 1978, awarding a fee of $23,000 to claimant's attorney. We reverse.

The order in this case recites consideration of transcripts, affidavits, and testimony, as well as Lee Engineering Construction Company v. Fellows, 209 So.2d 454 (Fla. 1968), and related cases. It does not, however, indicate how the various controlling factors are operative in the present case, and further fails to reveal the logic by which the fee was determined. McDonald's Drive-In v. Shrewsberry, IRC Order 2-3144 (April 22, 1977); Florida International Univ. v. Phillips, IRC Order 2-3902 (Sept. 11, 1979). The order appealed thus lacks sufficient statement of ultimate facts to show the basis of the award as required by Vargas v. Americana of Bal Harbour, 345 So.2d 1052 (Fla. 1976), and Pierce v. Piper Aircraft Corp., 279 So.2d 281 (Fla. 1973).

The order is accordingly reversed and the cause remanded for the entry of an order consistent with the cited controlling decisions.

LARRY G. SMITH, Acting C.J., and SHAW and WENTWORTH, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

AETNA MAINTENANCE CORP. v. LA BAFF

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Nov 29, 1979
377 So. 2d 53 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)
Case details for

AETNA MAINTENANCE CORP. v. LA BAFF

Case Details

Full title:AETNA MAINTENANCE CORP. AND STATE FARM FIRE CASUALTY CO., APPELLANTS, v…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Nov 29, 1979

Citations

377 So. 2d 53 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

Citing Cases

P. Tavilla Co., Inc. v. Sandoval

We affirm the deputy commissioner's finding of bad faith. While we express no opinion as to the…

Mele v. Superior Pontiac GMC, Inc.

We do not find this fee unreasonable; however, we are constrained to remand the cause because the deputy, in…