concluding that the district court's failure to resentence the defendant with parole at the discretion of the Board of Parole as it had previously done constituted a more severe sentence within the meaning of Pearce
Summary of this case from U.S. v. SteeleNo. 75-1862.
October 18, 1976, October TERM, 1976.
C.A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 532 F. 2d 792.
concluding that the district court's failure to resentence the defendant with parole at the discretion of the Board of Parole as it had previously done constituted a more severe sentence within the meaning of Pearce
Summary of this case from U.S. v. Steelesentencing judge may consider evidence obtained in violation of Fourth Amendment
Summary of this case from Speight v. U.S.Full title:ADVOCATES FOR THE ARTS ET AL. v. THOMSON, GOVERNOR OF NEW HAMPSHIRE, ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Oct 18, 1976
See 404 U.S. at 447 n. 5, 92 S.Ct. at 592 n. 5. Most illegally obtained evidence is not inherently…
U.S. v. McCroryAs one of our sister circuits has reasoned: "If the exclusionary rule were extended to sentencing in the…