From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Advanced Payroll Funding v. Adm. Staffing Resoruces

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Sep 21, 2007
CASE NO. 1:07 CV 0675 (N.D. Ohio Sep. 21, 2007)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:07 CV 0675.

September 21, 2007


ORDER


On March 21, 2003, the Court referred the above-captioned matter to Magistrate Judge George J. Limbert for a determination as to whether this Court has subject matter jurisdiction. (Dkt. # 9). Magistrate Judge Limbert held a hearing regarding said motion on July 30, 2007. He subsequently issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the Court has subject matter jurisdiction.

Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that an objection to a reports and recommendation must be filed within ten (10) days after service. See FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b). The parties have not filed any objections to the Report and Recommendation.

The Court has reviewed de novo the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. The Court determines that the Report and Recommendation is well-supported in fact and law. The Court therefore orders that the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Limbert is hereby ADOPTED. (Dkt. #9).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Advanced Payroll Funding v. Adm. Staffing Resoruces

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Sep 21, 2007
CASE NO. 1:07 CV 0675 (N.D. Ohio Sep. 21, 2007)
Case details for

Advanced Payroll Funding v. Adm. Staffing Resoruces

Case Details

Full title:ADVANCED PAYROLL FUNDING, PLAINTIFF v. ADMINISTRATIVE STAFFING RESORUCES…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Sep 21, 2007

Citations

CASE NO. 1:07 CV 0675 (N.D. Ohio Sep. 21, 2007)