From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Admin. for Children's Servs. v. Rachel H. (In re Roselyn S.)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Mar 29, 2011
919 N.Y.S.2d 390 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2011)

Opinion

2011-03-29

In the Matter of ROSELYN S. (Anonymous). Administration for Children's Services, respondent; Rachel H. (Anonymous), appellant.


Lauren Shapiro, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Sungso Lee, Jessica Marcus, and Joshua L. Seifert, of counsel), for appellant.

In a child neglect proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (McElrath, J.), dated October 20, 2010, which, upon her failure to appear at a dispositional hearing, in effect, directed her to appear for that hearing.

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court improperly relied on Family Court Act § 1037(a) by, in effect, directing the mother to appear at a dispositional hearing. That section, which, among other things, permits the Family Court, under certain circumstances, to compel a respondent's “initial appearance” in a Family Court Act article 10 proceeding (Family Ct. Act §§ 1033–a, 1033–b), was inapplicable, since the mother had already appeared before the Family Court and accepted service of the petition ( seeFamily Ct. Act § 1037[a]; cf.Family Ct. Act § 153).

MASTRO, J.P., DILLON, BALKIN and MILLER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Admin. for Children's Servs. v. Rachel H. (In re Roselyn S.)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Mar 29, 2011
919 N.Y.S.2d 390 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2011)
Case details for

Admin. for Children's Servs. v. Rachel H. (In re Roselyn S.)

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ROSELYN S. (Anonymous). Administration for Children's…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 29, 2011

Citations

919 N.Y.S.2d 390 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2011)
82 A.D.3d 1249
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 2685