Adler v. C.I.R

37 Citing cases

  1. George v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

    108 T.C. 5 (U.S.T.C. 1997)   Cited 15 times

    The Transfer RefundFor a further discussion of the Retirement System and the Pension System, see Adler v. Commissioner, 86 F.3d 378 (4th Cir. 1996), vacating and remanding T.C. Memo. 1995-148; Maryland State Teachers Association, Inc. v. Hughes, 594 F. Supp. 1353, 1357-1358 (D. Md. 1984). On October 4, 1989, petitioner elected to transfer from the Retirement System to the Pension System, effective November 1, 1989.

  2. Long v. Merrifield Town Ctr.

    611 F.3d 240 (4th Cir. 2010)   Cited 16 times
    Affirming and adopting the Guidelines' interpretation of § 1702

    Because § 1702(a)(2) is ambiguous in this regard, we must ascertain the interpretation of the statute that best implements Congress' intent and gives effect to the statute's purpose. See Adler v. Comm'r, 86 F.3d 378, 380-81 (4th Cir. 1996); see also Food Town Stores, Inc. v. EEOC, 708 F.2d 920, 924 (4th Cir. 1983) ("A statute must be interpreted to give it the single, most harmonious, comprehensive meaning possible in light of the legislative policy and purpose"); Berry v. Atl. Greyhound Lines, Inc., 114 F.2d 255, 257-58 (4th Cir. 1940) ("A statute should . . . be interpreted both as a whole and also in the light of its general scope, tenor and purpose"). ILSFDA is a remedial statute enacted to prevent interstate land fraud and to protect unsuspecting and ill-informed investors from buying undesirable land.

  3. Holland v. Big River Minerals Corporation

    181 F.3d 597 (4th Cir. 1999)   Cited 147 times
    Concluding that there was no "strong precedent" where the precise issue in the case at bar "remained an open question" in the precedent (quoting Curtis Publ'g Co. v. Butts, 388 U.S. 130, 143, 87 S. Ct. 1975, 18 L. Ed. 2d 1094 (1967))

    In our view, the statutory language is reasonably susceptible to either of these two interpretations. See Robinson, 519 U.S. at 342 (holding statute is ambiguous where it "could just as easily be read to" have one meaning as another); Adler v. Commissioner, 86 F.3d 378, 380 (4th Cir. 1996) (holding statute ambiguous because it was reasonably susceptible to multiple meanings). And, having determined that these provisions are ambiguous, we look to the purpose of the Coal Act, as revealed in the legislative history, to resolve their meaning.

  4. Ransom v. Herr

    2:20-CV-1209-DJC-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 6, 2023)

    The Fifth and Sixth Circuits follow the same rule. See Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383 (5th Cir. 1996); In re Alea, 86 F.3d 378 (6th Cir. 2002).

  5. Roberts v. CARUSO

    2:22-CV-1831-DJC-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 6, 2023)

    The Fifth and Sixth Circuits follow the same rule. See Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383 (5th Cir. 1996); In re Alea, 86 F.3d 378 (6th Cir. 2002).

  6. Driver v. Chavez

    2:22-CV-1447-DJC-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 6, 2023)

    The Fifth and Sixth Circuits follow the same rule. See Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383 (5th Cir. 1996); In re Alea, 86 F.3d 378 (6th Cir. 2002).

  7. Bradrof v. Delgato

    2:21-CV-1846-DJC-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 6, 2023)

    The Fifth and Sixth Circuits follow the same rule. See Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383 (5th Cir. 1996); In re Alea, 86 F.3d 378 (6th Cir. 2002).

  8. Garland v. Allison

    2:21-CV-0796-DAD-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 18, 2023)

    The Fifth and Sixth Circuits follow the same rule. See Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383 (5th Cir. 1996); In re Alea, 86 F.3d 378 (6th Cir. 2002).

  9. Rice v. Boulware

    2:20-CV-1752-KJM-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 24, 2023)

    The Fifth and Sixth Circuits follow the same rule. See Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383 (5th Cir. 1996); In re Alea, 86 F.3d 378 (6th Cir. 2002).

  10. Hammler v. Pleshchuk

    2:20-CV-0884-TLN-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 8, 2022)

    The Fifth and Sixth Circuits follow the same rule. See Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383 (5th Cir. 1996); In re Alea, 86 F.3d 378 (6th Cir. 2002).