From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Adlard v. Adams

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Mar 29, 2010
CV 09-7197-PA (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 29, 2010)

Opinion


JAMES ADLARD, Petitioner, v. DERREL G. ADAMS, Warden, Respondent. No. CV 09-7197-PA (JEM). United States District Court, C.D. California. March 29, 2010.

          ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          PERCY ANDERSON, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, all the records and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The time for filing Objections to the Report and Recommendation has expired, and no Objections have been filed. The Court concurs with and adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

         IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: (1) Respondent's Motion to Dismiss is denied; and (2) Respondent shall file an Answer to the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. Petitioner may file a single Reply responding to matters raised in the Answer within thirty (30) days of the date the Answer is filed and served. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, this case shall be deemed submitted on the day following the date Petitioner's Reply to the Answer is due.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Adlard v. Adams

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Mar 29, 2010
CV 09-7197-PA (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 29, 2010)
Case details for

Adlard v. Adams

Case Details

Full title:JAMES ADLARD, Petitioner, v. DERREL G. ADAMS, Warden, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Mar 29, 2010

Citations

CV 09-7197-PA (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 29, 2010)