From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Adkins v. Spurlock

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Mar 10, 2022
CIVIL 3:21-cv-00863 (M.D. Tenn. Mar. 10, 2022)

Opinion

CIVIL 3:21-cv-00863

03-10-2022

JAMES L. ADKINS, ET AL., Plaintiffs, v. BILL SPURLOCK, Director of Rutherford County Schools, Defendants.


ORDER

ALETA A. TRAUGER, U.S. District Judge.

On February 18, 2022, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (Doc No. 16), to which no timely objections have been filed. The Report and Recommendation is therefore ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this court. For the reasons expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to prosecute and, further, the Motion to Dismiss filed by the defendant (Doc. No. 8) is DENIED AS MOOT.

It is so ORDERED.


Summaries of

Adkins v. Spurlock

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Mar 10, 2022
CIVIL 3:21-cv-00863 (M.D. Tenn. Mar. 10, 2022)
Case details for

Adkins v. Spurlock

Case Details

Full title:JAMES L. ADKINS, ET AL., Plaintiffs, v. BILL SPURLOCK, Director of…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division

Date published: Mar 10, 2022

Citations

CIVIL 3:21-cv-00863 (M.D. Tenn. Mar. 10, 2022)