From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Adkins v. Astrue

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Nov 30, 2010
Civil Action 2:10-cv-030 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 30, 2010)

Opinion

Civil Action 2:10-cv-030.

November 30, 2010


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Abel's October 8, 2010 Report and Recommendation that this case be remanded to the Commissioner to permit the administrative law judge to properly evaluate the medical source opinions in accordance with 20 C.F.R. § 404.1527(d)(2) (doc. 14). No objections have been filed to the Report and Recommendation. The Court, having reviewed the record de novo, determines that remand is required fo the reasons set out in the report and recommendation . . .

Upon de novo review in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation. This case is hereby REMANDED to the Commissioner of Social Security to permit the administrative law judge to properly evaluate the medical source opinions in accordance with 20 C.F.R. § 404.1527(d)(2). The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED close this case.


Summaries of

Adkins v. Astrue

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Nov 30, 2010
Civil Action 2:10-cv-030 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 30, 2010)
Case details for

Adkins v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:William Adkins, Plaintiff v. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Nov 30, 2010

Citations

Civil Action 2:10-cv-030 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 30, 2010)