From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Adika v. County of Rockland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 6, 1983
96 A.D.2d 1025 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)

Opinion

September 6, 1983


In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for willful deprivation and impairment of plaintiffs' rights, as parents, to the custody and control of their infant children, plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Slifkin, J.), entered September 14, 1981, which dismissed the complaint. Judgment modified, by adding thereto a provision granting plaintiffs leave to replead their cause of action for willful deprivation and impairment of their rights, as parents, to the custody and control of their infant children. As so modified, judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. In our opinion, the complaint attempts to state, albeit insufficiently, a cause of action for willful deprivation of plaintiffs' rights, as parents, to the custody and control of their infant children ( McEntee v New York Foundling Hosp., 21 Misc.2d 903). However, under the circumstances, plaintiffs should have been granted leave to replead said cause of action pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd [e]). We further note that said cause of action ripened and accrued on or about February 11, 1980, the date this court affirmed the order of the Family Court, Rockland County, dismissing a child abuse and neglect petition against the plaintiffs. Lazer, J.P., Weinstein, Bracken and Rubin, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Adika v. County of Rockland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 6, 1983
96 A.D.2d 1025 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)
Case details for

Adika v. County of Rockland

Case Details

Full title:SHABTAI ADIKA et al., Appellants, v. COUNTY OF ROCKLAND et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 6, 1983

Citations

96 A.D.2d 1025 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)

Citing Cases

Schenkman v. New York College of Health Professionals

Such allegations are legally sufficient to state a cognizable cause of action for slander ( see Dillon v.…

Sager v. Rochester Gen. Hosp

Conversely, at least in recent years, there has been a recognition that this tort cause of action may be…