From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Addison v. Hardy

Supreme Court of Florida.
Oct 11, 2012
103 So. 3d 138 (Fla. 2012)

Opinion

No. SC12–1721.

2012-10-11

Aaron Jamal ADDISON, Petitioner(s) v. Jeff HARDY, Sheriff, Respondent(s).


It appearing to this Court that petitioner has filed the instant pro se petition while represented by counsel, the petition for writ of habeas corpus is hereby stricken as an unauthorized pleading, and the cause is dismissed. See, e.g., Gilbert v. Singletary, 632 So.2d 1104, 1104 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994) (refusing to entertain pro se habeas petition where petitioner was represented by counsel and direct appeal was pending; “[A] party may not be simultaneously represented by counsel and yet file pro se pleadings or petitions in the same case.”); Thompson v. State, 615 So.2d 737, 741 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993)(holding that pro se motion for discharge filed when defendant was represented by counsel is a nullity); Salser v. State, 582 So.2d 12, 14 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991) (same).


Summaries of

Addison v. Hardy

Supreme Court of Florida.
Oct 11, 2012
103 So. 3d 138 (Fla. 2012)
Case details for

Addison v. Hardy

Case Details

Full title:Aaron Jamal ADDISON, Petitioner(s) v. Jeff HARDY, Sheriff, Respondent(s).

Court:Supreme Court of Florida.

Date published: Oct 11, 2012

Citations

103 So. 3d 138 (Fla. 2012)