Opinion
2:15CV00194-DPM-JJV
02-29-2016
PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
INSTRUCTIONS
The following recommended disposition has been sent to United States District Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. Any party may serve and file written objections to this recommendation. Objections should be specific and should include the factual or legal basis for the objection. If the objection is to a factual finding, specifically identify that finding and the evidence that supports your objection. An original and one copy of your objections must be received in the office of the United States District Court Clerk no later than fourteen (14) days from the date of the findings and recommendations. The copy will be furnished to the opposing party. Failure to file timely objections may result in waiver of the right to appeal questions of fact.
If you are objecting to the recommendation and also desire to submit new, different, or additional evidence, and to have a hearing for this purpose before either the District Judge or Magistrate Judge, you must, at the time you file your written objections, include the following:
1. Why the record made before the Magistrate Judge is inadequate.
2. Why the evidence to be proffered at the new hearing (if such a hearing is granted) was not offered at the hearing before the Magistrate Judge.
3. The details of any testimony desired to be introduced at the new hearing in the form of an offer of proof, and a copy, or the original, of any documentary or other non-testimonial evidence desired to be introduced at the new hearing.
From this submission, the District Judge will determine the necessity for an additional evidentiary hearing. Mail your objections and "Statement of Necessity" to:
Clerk, United States District Court
Eastern District of Arkansas
600 West Capitol Avenue, Suite A149
Little Rock, AR 72201-3325
DISPOSITION
Abdul Elijah Muhammad ("Plaintiff") began this action on December 7, 2015, by filing an Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit ("Application") (Doc. No. 1) and a pro se Complaint (Doc. No. 2). His Application was incomplete because it lacked either a calculation sheet or a certified copy of his inmate trust fund account. I ordered Plaintiff to provide a completed application within thirty (30) days. To date, Plaintiff has not complied with or otherwise responded to my Order.
Plaintiff alleged that his account certification was being withheld by prison staff. A copy of my order denying his Application was sent to the warden of the East Arkansas Regional Unit and it requested his assistance in procuring the necessary documents. To date, Plaintiff has not notified the Court of other problems obtaining the necessary documentation.
Several mailings sent to Plaintiff have been returned as undeliverable. (Doc. Nos. 5, 6, & 7.) It is Plaintiff's responsibility to keep the Court apprised of his most current address, however. --------
IT IS, THEREFORE, RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. No. 2) be DISMISSED without prejudice.
Dated this 29th day of February, 2016.
/s/_________
JOE J. VOLPE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE