From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Adc v. Gibson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION
Mar 4, 2021
CASE NO. 4:20-CV-00744-BSM (E.D. Ark. Mar. 4, 2021)

Opinion

CASE NO. 4:20-CV-00744-BSM

03-04-2021

JESSIE HILL ADC #104136 PLAINTIFF v. JAMES GIBSON, et al. DEFENDANTS


ORDER

Jessie Hill's motion to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. No. 1] is denied. His motions [Doc. Nos. 3, 4] are denied as moot.

Hill has received at least three strikes under PLRA. See Hill v. Kelley, 5:18-CV-00219-JLH (E.D. Ark filed August 24, 2018); Hill v. Kelley, 5:16-CV-00277-JLH (E.D. Ark. filed September 7, 2016); Hill v. Kelley, 5:16-CV-00258-JLH ( E.D. Ark. filed August 15, 2016). Based on the allegations in his complaint [Doc. No. 2], it does not appear that Hill is in imminent danger of serious physical injury. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

Accordingly, this case is dismissed without prejudice. If Hill would like to continue with this case, he must first pay the filing fee of $402 to the clerk, noting the above style and case number, within thirty days of the date of this order along with a motion to reopen this case. Upon receipt of the full filing fee and his motion, this case will be reopened. An in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 4th day of March, 2021.

/s/_________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Adc v. Gibson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION
Mar 4, 2021
CASE NO. 4:20-CV-00744-BSM (E.D. Ark. Mar. 4, 2021)
Case details for

Adc v. Gibson

Case Details

Full title:JESSIE HILL ADC #104136 PLAINTIFF v. JAMES GIBSON, et al. DEFENDANTS

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION

Date published: Mar 4, 2021

Citations

CASE NO. 4:20-CV-00744-BSM (E.D. Ark. Mar. 4, 2021)