From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Adamson v. Wells Fargo Bank

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION
Jan 11, 2018
No. 3:17-cv-00228-MO (D. Or. Jan. 11, 2018)

Opinion

No. 3:17-cv-00228-MO

01-11-2018

KENT ADAMSON and GRACE ADAMSON, Plaintiffs, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, Defendant.


OPINION AND ORDER MOSMAN, J.,

Pro se Plaintiffs Kent and Grace Adamson filed a Complaint [2] on February 10, 2017. The Adamsons also filed an Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis [1] and a Motion for Appointment of Counsel [3].

I granted the Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, and it remains granted, but I dismissed the complaint without service of process. Order [8]. I gave the Adamsons thirty days to file an amended complaint that cured the jurisdictional and claim deficiencies identified in the order. Order [8]. The Adamsons filed an Amended Complaint [12] twenty days later.

The Court now finds that the Amended Complaint [12] sufficiently cures the jurisdictional and claim deficiencies as required by the Court's Order [8]. The Clerk's Office is directed to issue U.S. Marshal's Form 285 and summons to the Adamsons for service of the Amended Complaint [12]. The Adamsons have thirty days to serve the Amended Complaint. The Court STRIKES the former Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order [15].

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 11th day of January, 2018.

/s/_________

MICHAEL W. MOSMAN

Chief United States District Judge


Summaries of

Adamson v. Wells Fargo Bank

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION
Jan 11, 2018
No. 3:17-cv-00228-MO (D. Or. Jan. 11, 2018)
Case details for

Adamson v. Wells Fargo Bank

Case Details

Full title:KENT ADAMSON and GRACE ADAMSON, Plaintiffs, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

Date published: Jan 11, 2018

Citations

No. 3:17-cv-00228-MO (D. Or. Jan. 11, 2018)