Adamson v. Bureau of Labor & Indus.

Full title: Barry ADAMSON, Petitioner, v. BUREAU OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES, Respondent.

Court: Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Date published: Apr 18, 2018

415 P.3d 1153 (Or. Ct. App. 2018)

291 Or. App. 445

91 Or. App. 445

Opinion

A165559

04-18-2018

Barry ADAMSON, Petitioner, v. BUREAU OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES, Respondent.

Barry Adamson filed the briefs pro se. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Carson L. Whitehead, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Barry Adamson filed the briefs pro se.

Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and

Carson L. Whitehead, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Ortega, Presiding Judge, and Garrett, Judge, and Powers, Judge.

PER CURIAM

Under ORS 183.400, petitioner seeks a judicial determination of the validity of four administrative rules adopted by the Bureau of Labor and Industries, arguing that OAR 839-005-0005, OAR 839-005-0010, OAR 839-005-0205, and OAR 839-005-0206 are unconstitutionally overbroad under the free exercise clauses in Article I, sections 2 and 3, of the Oregon Constitution. Having reviewed petitioner's arguments, we conclude that the rules challenged by him are valid.

OAR 839-005-0005, OAR 839-005-0010, OAR 839-005-0205, and OAR 839-005-0206 held valid.