Opinion
2:17-CV-11056
03-25-2022
JAMES R. ADAMS, Petitioner, v. KRIS TASKILA, Respondent,
ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE COURT TO TRANSFER THE APPLICATION TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYING FEES AND COSTS ON APPEAL (ECF NO. 47) TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
HONORABLE SEAN F. COX, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
On February 1, 2022, this Court denied the petition for writ of habeas corpus and declined to issue a certificate of appealability or grant leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Adams v. Taskila, No. 2:17-CV-11056, 2022 WL 303240 (E.D. Mich. Feb. 1, 2022).
Petitioner filed a Notice of Appeal (ECF No. 46). This Court also subsequently construed petitioner's request for an extension of time to file his notice of appeal as a timely filed Notice of Appeal. (ECF No. 49).
Petitioner also filed an application to proceed without prepayment of fees and costs on appeal with this Court. For the reasons stated below, the Court orders that the application be transferred to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
A notice of appeal generally “confers jurisdiction on the court of appeals and divests the district court of control over those aspects of the case involved in the appeal.” Marrese v. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 470 U.S. 373, 379 (1985)(citing Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co., 459 U.S. 56, 58 (1982)(per curiam));. Workman v. Tate, 958 F.2d 164, 167 (6th Cir. 1992). Petitioner's notice of appeal divests this Court of jurisdiction to consider his motion that he be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis in the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. See Johnson v. Woods, No. 5:12-11632; 2013 WL 557271, * 2 (E.D. Mich. Feb. 13, 2013); Glick v. U.S. Civil Service Com'n, 567 F.Supp. 1483, 1490 (N.D. Ill. 1983); Brinton v. Gaffney, 560 F.Supp. 28, 29-30 (E.D. Pa. 1983). Jurisdiction of this action was transferred from the district court to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals upon the filing of the Notice of Appeal; Petitioner's application to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal should be addressed by the Sixth Circuit. In the interests of justice, this Court orders that the application to proceed without prepayment of fees and costs be transferred to the Sixth Circuit for that court's consideration. See Baker v. Perry, No. 2:12-10424; 2012 WL 6097323, * 2 (E.D. Mich. Dec. 6, 2012).
IT IS ORDERED that:
The Clerk of the Court transfer the “Application to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees and Costs on Appeal” (ECF No. 47) to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631.