From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Adams v. Poland Spring Water Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Jul 8, 2019
CIVIL NO. 2:17-CV-355-DBH (D. Me. Jul. 8, 2019)

Opinion

CIVIL NO. 2:17-CV-355-DBH

07-08-2019

JUSTIN ADAMS, PLAINTIFF v. POLAND SPRING WATER CO. OWNER, ET AL., DEFENDANT


ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On June 6, 2019, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with a copy to the plaintiff, his Recommended Decision on Motion to Reopen. The time within which to file an objection expired on June 20, 2019, and no objection has been filed. The Magistrate Judge notified the plaintiff that failure to object would waive his right to de novo review and appeal.

It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. The plaintiff's motion to reopen the case is DENIED.

I hereby place Justin Adams on Notice that filing restrictions "may be in the offing." Cok v. Family Court of Rhode Island, 985 F.2d 32, 35 (1st Cir. 1993). This represents the "cautionary order" of which Cok speaks. Id. Groundless and inappropriate filings will not be tolerated.

SO ORDERED.

DATED THIS 8TH DAY OF JULY, 2019

/S/D. BROCK HORNBY

D. BROCK HORNBY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Adams v. Poland Spring Water Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Jul 8, 2019
CIVIL NO. 2:17-CV-355-DBH (D. Me. Jul. 8, 2019)
Case details for

Adams v. Poland Spring Water Co.

Case Details

Full title:JUSTIN ADAMS, PLAINTIFF v. POLAND SPRING WATER CO. OWNER, ET AL., DEFENDANT

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

Date published: Jul 8, 2019

Citations

CIVIL NO. 2:17-CV-355-DBH (D. Me. Jul. 8, 2019)