From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Adams v. Patel

United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division
Nov 25, 2009
CIVIL ACTION NO. H-09-02283 (S.D. Tex. Nov. 25, 2009)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. H-09-02283.

November 25, 2009


ORDER


On July 17, 2009, the plaintiff filed this suit. On August 6, 2009, the defendant moved to dismiss or for a more definite statement. This court denied the motion to dismiss but granted the motion for more definite statement and ordered the plaintiff to replead by October 30, 2009. The order to replead warned that failure to do so could lead to dismissal. The plaintiff did not replead or take other action in the case. On November 3, 2009, the defendant again moved to dismiss. The plaintiff again filed no response. Nor did the plaintiff participate in the joint discovery/case management plan.

The plaintiff has failed to comply with this court's order, to file any response to motions, and to participate in the Rule 26(f) meeting. This case is dismissed for failure to prosecute and for noncompliance with court orders.


Summaries of

Adams v. Patel

United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division
Nov 25, 2009
CIVIL ACTION NO. H-09-02283 (S.D. Tex. Nov. 25, 2009)
Case details for

Adams v. Patel

Case Details

Full title:CURTIS ADAMS, Plaintiff, v. DR. SHATISH PATEL and BEECHNUT DIALYSIS…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division

Date published: Nov 25, 2009

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. H-09-02283 (S.D. Tex. Nov. 25, 2009)