From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Adams v. James

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Oct 24, 1995
906 S.W.2d 869 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995)

Opinion

No. 67304.

August 8, 1995. Motions for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied September 25, 1995. Application to Transfer Denied October 24, 1995.

Craig S. Adams, appellant, acting pro se.

Gary D. James, et al., respondents, acting pro se.

Before SMITH, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and RHODES, JJ.


ORDER


Appellant, Craig S. Adams, appeals from the judgment in his court-tried defamation action against respondents Gary D. James, Connie Roberts, and James Van Amburg. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the judgment is supported by the evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence, and no error of law appears. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the circuit court's judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Adams v. James

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Oct 24, 1995
906 S.W.2d 869 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995)
Case details for

Adams v. James

Case Details

Full title:CRAIG S. ADAMS, APPELLANT, v. GARY D. JAMES, ET AL., RESPONDENTS

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three

Date published: Oct 24, 1995

Citations

906 S.W.2d 869 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995)

Citing Cases

In re Inman

Judge Federman's opinion is the tenth of a series of opinions arising from Adams' civil and criminal appeals.…