From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Adams v. Hunsberger

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Sep 25, 2007
Civil Action No. 04-213J (W.D. Pa. Sep. 25, 2007)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 04-213J.

September 25, 2007


Re: Dkt. [38] ORDER


AND NOW, this 25th day of September, 2007, after the Plaintiff, Geoffrey Adams, filed an action in the above-captioned case, and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge granting the parties ten days after being served with a copy to file written objections thereto, and objections having been filed by Plaintiff which are without merit, and upon independent review of the motion for summary judgment and the record, and upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, which is adopted as the opinion of this Court,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is granted;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, if the parties desire to appeal from this Order they must do so within thirty (30) days by filing a notice of appeal as provided in Rule 3, Fed.R.App.P.


Summaries of

Adams v. Hunsberger

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Sep 25, 2007
Civil Action No. 04-213J (W.D. Pa. Sep. 25, 2007)
Case details for

Adams v. Hunsberger

Case Details

Full title:GEOFFREY ADAMS, Plaintiff v. MARDI HUNSBERGER, Superintendent; GARY HILER…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Sep 25, 2007

Citations

Civil Action No. 04-213J (W.D. Pa. Sep. 25, 2007)

Citing Cases

Newmones v. Ransom

And regardless, Newmones has not pleaded, as he must, that he was injured by this two-day deprivation of…