From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Adams v. H&P Capital, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION
Jun 23, 2015
CASE NO. 4:13CV542 (E.D. Tex. Jun. 23, 2015)

Opinion

CASE NO. 4:13CV542

06-23-2015

BRIAN ADAMS, Plaintiff v. H & P CAPITAL, INC., Defendant.


MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On March 13, 2014, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that this case be dismissed without prejudice for want of prosecution.

Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, this court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge's recommendations as the findings and conclusions of the court. Therefore, this case is dismissed without prejudice for want of prosecution.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

SIGNED this the 23rd day of June, 2015.

/s/_________

RICHARD A. SCHELL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Adams v. H&P Capital, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION
Jun 23, 2015
CASE NO. 4:13CV542 (E.D. Tex. Jun. 23, 2015)
Case details for

Adams v. H&P Capital, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:BRIAN ADAMS, Plaintiff v. H & P CAPITAL, INC., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

Date published: Jun 23, 2015

Citations

CASE NO. 4:13CV542 (E.D. Tex. Jun. 23, 2015)