From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Adam v. Gelman

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 11, 2023
2:23-cv-00600-TLN-EFB (E.D. Cal. Jul. 11, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-cv-00600-TLN-EFB

07-11-2023

ANDREW THADDEUS TROITAN ADAM, Plaintiff, v. SUSAN GELMAN, Defendant.


ORDER

TROY L. NUNLEY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff, a county jail inmate proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On May 25, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on Plaintiff, and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 12.)

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed May 25, 2023 (ECF No. 7), are ADOPTED IN FULL; and
2. This action is DISMISSED with prejudice.


Summaries of

Adam v. Gelman

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 11, 2023
2:23-cv-00600-TLN-EFB (E.D. Cal. Jul. 11, 2023)
Case details for

Adam v. Gelman

Case Details

Full title:ANDREW THADDEUS TROITAN ADAM, Plaintiff, v. SUSAN GELMAN, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jul 11, 2023

Citations

2:23-cv-00600-TLN-EFB (E.D. Cal. Jul. 11, 2023)