Opinion
No. 3:17-cv-00632-AC
08-10-2018
ADAM C., Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant.
ORDER :
Magistrate Judge Acosta issued a Findings and Recommendation [24] on May 7, 2018, in which he recommends that this Court affirm the Commissioner's decision denying Plaintiff's applications for Social Security Disability and Supplemental Security Income benefits. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
Plaintiff filed timely objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings & Recommendation. Pl.'s Obj., ECF 26. When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge's Findings & Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc).
The Court has carefully considered Plaintiff's objections and concludes there is no basis to modify the Findings & Recommendation. The Court has also reviewed the pertinent portions of the record de novo and finds no errors in the Magistrate Judge's Findings & Recommendation.
CONCLUSION
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Acosta's Findings and Recommendation [24]. The Commissioner's decision is affirmed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this 10 day of August, 2018.
/s/_________
MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ
United States District Judge