In Acuity, the state appellate court held that the insurer had a duty to defend and indemnify the insured pharmaceutical distributor in underlying suits transferred to the MDL.
Summary of this case from Meijer, Inc. v. United States Fid. & Guar. Co.2020-1134
12-15-2020
ACUITY v. MASTERS PHARMACEUTICAL, INC.
APPEAL ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
Donnelly and Stewart, JJ., dissent.
In Acuity, the state appellate court held that the insurer had a duty to defend and indemnify the insured pharmaceutical distributor in underlying suits transferred to the MDL.
Summary of this case from Meijer, Inc. v. United States Fid. & Guar. Co.Full title:ACUITY v. MASTERS PHARMACEUTICAL, INC.
Court:Supreme Court of Ohio.
Date published: Dec 15, 2020
Meijer further asserts that remand is required since the Ohio Supreme Court has accepted for review Acuity…
Cardinal Health, Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of PittsburghThis case presents no concerns of comity, because there is no underlying state case to which comity might be…