From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

ACS STATE HEALTHCARE, LLC v. HEINEMAN

United States District Court, D. Nebraska
Nov 19, 2008
4:08CV3021 (D. Neb. Nov. 19, 2008)

Opinion

4:08CV3021.

November 19, 2008


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on plaintiff's motion to dismiss state defendants without prejudice and to lift the stay of discovery (Filing No. 160) and on the state defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings (Filing No. 152). The plaintiff brings its motion pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(2). The Court notes that the state defendants do not oppose plaintiff's motion to dismiss and finds that they will suffer no legal prejudice as a result of the dismissal. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED:

1) Plaintiff's motion to dismiss state defendants without prejudice and to lift the stay of discovery (Filing No. 160) is granted; counts one and two of the plaintiff's second amended complaint and defendants David Heineman, Jon Bruning, Carlos Castillo, Christine Peterson, and Steve Sulek are dismissed without prejudice; the remaining parties may resume discovery.

2) State defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings (Filing No. 152) is denied as moot.


Summaries of

ACS STATE HEALTHCARE, LLC v. HEINEMAN

United States District Court, D. Nebraska
Nov 19, 2008
4:08CV3021 (D. Neb. Nov. 19, 2008)
Case details for

ACS STATE HEALTHCARE, LLC v. HEINEMAN

Case Details

Full title:ACS STATE HEALTHCARE, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company…

Court:United States District Court, D. Nebraska

Date published: Nov 19, 2008

Citations

4:08CV3021 (D. Neb. Nov. 19, 2008)