From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Acosta v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 9, 1992
599 So. 2d 284 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Opinion

No. 91-3025.

June 9, 1992.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County; Philip W. Knight, Judge.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Rosa C. Figarola, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Roberta G. Mandel, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before BASKIN, FERGUSON and JORGENSON, JJ.


We affirm defendant's convictions for possession of marijuana and cocaine. Defendant did not preserve for review the trial court's failure to declare a mistrial, see Riechmann v. State, 581 So.2d 133 (Fla. 1991), or its failure to give the agreed upon cautionary instruction. Castor v. State, 365 So.2d 701, 703 (Fla. 1978); Crespo v. State, 505 So.2d 685 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987). Furthermore, the record does not disclose that the prosecutor's question constituted fundamental error. See Woodard v. State, 579 So.2d 875 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Acosta v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 9, 1992
599 So. 2d 284 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)
Case details for

Acosta v. State

Case Details

Full title:LUIS M. ACOSTA, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jun 9, 1992

Citations

599 So. 2d 284 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)