From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Acosta v. O'Malley

United States District Court, District of Idaho
Jul 23, 2024
1:24-cv-00276-BLW-CWD (D. Idaho Jul. 23, 2024)

Opinion

1:24-cv-00276-BLW-CWD

07-23-2024

JUSTIN ACOSTA, Plaintiff, v. MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

B. LYNN WINMILL U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Before the Court is a Report and Recommendation filed by United States Magistrate Judge Candy W. Dale (Dkt. 9). On June 11, 2024, the Clerk of the Court conditionally filed the plaintiff's Complaint as a result of his in forma pauperis request. See Dkt. 3. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, Judge Dale conducted a review of the plaintiff's application to determine whether the plaintiff is entitled to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee.

On July 8, 2024, Judge Dale issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis be denied. Dkt. 9. Pursuant to the statute, Judge Dale gave the parties time to file written objections to the Report and Recommendation. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(C). No objections were filed.

Having thoroughly reviewed the Report and Recommendation, and no objections having been filed, the Court accepts Judge Dale's Report and Recommendation in its entirety and enters the following order consistent with the same.

ORDER

IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation entered on July 8, 2024 (Dkt. 9) is INCORPORATED and ADOPTED in its entirety.

2. The Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. 3) is DENIED.


Summaries of

Acosta v. O'Malley

United States District Court, District of Idaho
Jul 23, 2024
1:24-cv-00276-BLW-CWD (D. Idaho Jul. 23, 2024)
Case details for

Acosta v. O'Malley

Case Details

Full title:JUSTIN ACOSTA, Plaintiff, v. MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, District of Idaho

Date published: Jul 23, 2024

Citations

1:24-cv-00276-BLW-CWD (D. Idaho Jul. 23, 2024)