From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Acme Markets, Inc. v. Tri-City Shopping Center

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 23, 1965
24 A.D.2d 728 (N.Y. App. Div. 1965)

Opinion

September 23, 1965


Motion, insofar as it seeks dismissal of appeal on the ground that the notice of appeal fails to specify the order or judgment appealed from, denied, without costs, and without prejudice to its renewal upon the argument. Motion in all other respects denied, without costs, upon condition appellant shall, on or before October 18, 1965, file and serve record, brief and notice of argument for the term commencing November 15, 1965. It does not appear from the papers before us whether the transcript of the examination before trial conducted March 25, 1965, should be included in the record on appeal (CPLR 5526), inasmuch as the judgment or order does not recite the papers used on the motion (CPLR 2219, subd. [a]), the remedy under these circumstances being an application to Special Term to resettle the order. Gibson, P.J., Herlihy, Taylor, Aulisi and Hamm, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Acme Markets, Inc. v. Tri-City Shopping Center

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 23, 1965
24 A.D.2d 728 (N.Y. App. Div. 1965)
Case details for

Acme Markets, Inc. v. Tri-City Shopping Center

Case Details

Full title:ACME MARKETS, INC., Appellant, v. TRI-CITY SHOPPING CENTER, INC., et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Sep 23, 1965

Citations

24 A.D.2d 728 (N.Y. App. Div. 1965)

Citing Cases

Singer v. Bd. of Educ. of the City of New York

The recital requirement contained in CPLR 2219 (subd [a]) is designed to identify those papers which should…