From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ackman v. Taylor

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 23, 1946
68 N.E.2d 881 (N.Y. 1946)

Summary

In Ackman v. Taylor (296 N.Y. 597), it appeared from the complaint that the defendant (prospective lessee) agreed upon the terms of the proposed letting and approved the lease as procured by the brokers.

Summary of this case from Duross Co. v. Evans

Opinion

Argued June 11, 1946

Decided July 23, 1946

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, SCHREIBER, J.

Herbert P. Jacoby, Louis D. Frohlich and Arthur H. Schwartz for appellant.

Emanuel A. Stern for respondents.


Order affirmed, with costs. Question certified answered in the affirmative. No opinion.

Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, THACHER and FULD, JJ. Taking no part: DYE, J.


Summaries of

Ackman v. Taylor

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 23, 1946
68 N.E.2d 881 (N.Y. 1946)

In Ackman v. Taylor (296 N.Y. 597), it appeared from the complaint that the defendant (prospective lessee) agreed upon the terms of the proposed letting and approved the lease as procured by the brokers.

Summary of this case from Duross Co. v. Evans
Case details for

Ackman v. Taylor

Case Details

Full title:HERMAN ACKMAN et al., Copartners Doing Business under the Name of ACKMAN…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jul 23, 1946

Citations

68 N.E.2d 881 (N.Y. 1946)
68 N.E.2d 881

Citing Cases

Duross Co. v. Evans

Although a proposed purchaser does not undertake to pay the commission, he may be liable for consequential…

Wishnow v. Kingsway Estates

In consequence the plaintiffs lost the commission they would have earned had the deal been consummated. The…