From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ackley v. Birholtz

United States District Court, District of Minnesota
Oct 6, 2021
Civil 21-1806 (JRT/LIB) (D. Minn. Oct. 6, 2021)

Opinion

Civil 21-1806 (JRT/LIB)

10-06-2021

MARK ACKLEY, Petitioner, v. B. BIRHOLTZ, WARDEN OF FEDERAL PRISON CAMP DULUTH, AND MICHAEL CARVAJAL, DIRECTOR OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, IN THERE OFFICIAL CAPACITIES, Defendants,

MARK ACKLEY, FPC DULUTH, REG NO. 16755-029, FPC-DULUTH, P.O. BOX 1000, DULUTH, MN 55814-1000, PRO-SE PETITIONER. ANA H. VOSS, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, 300 S. 4TH STREET, SUITE 600, MINNEAPOLIS, MN, 55415, FOR RESPONDENT. ANN M. BILDTSEN, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, 300 S. 4TH STREET, SUITE 600, MINNEAPOLIS, MN, 55415, FOR RESPONDENT.


MARK ACKLEY, FPC DULUTH, REG NO. 16755-029, FPC-DULUTH, P.O. BOX 1000, DULUTH, MN 55814-1000, PRO-SE PETITIONER.

ANA H. VOSS, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, 300 S. 4TH STREET, SUITE 600, MINNEAPOLIS, MN, 55415, FOR RESPONDENT.

ANN M. BILDTSEN, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, 300 S. 4TH STREET, SUITE 600, MINNEAPOLIS, MN, 55415, FOR RESPONDENT.

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

JOHN R. TUNHEIM CHIEF JUDGE

Based upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois, and after an independent review of the files, records and proceedings in the above-entitled matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.


Summaries of

Ackley v. Birholtz

United States District Court, District of Minnesota
Oct 6, 2021
Civil 21-1806 (JRT/LIB) (D. Minn. Oct. 6, 2021)
Case details for

Ackley v. Birholtz

Case Details

Full title:MARK ACKLEY, Petitioner, v. B. BIRHOLTZ, WARDEN OF FEDERAL PRISON CAMP…

Court:United States District Court, District of Minnesota

Date published: Oct 6, 2021

Citations

Civil 21-1806 (JRT/LIB) (D. Minn. Oct. 6, 2021)