From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ackers v. Kerry

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Jul 6, 2018
Civil Action No. 18-1296 (UNA) (D.D.C. Jul. 6, 2018)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 18-1296 (UNA)

07-06-2018

GREGORY ACKERS, Plaintiff, v. JOHN KERRY, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter comes before the Court upon review of plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and his pro se complaint. Plaintiff alleges that John Kerry, former United States Senator and Secretary of State, acted as an unregistered foreign agent when he met with the Iranian Foreign Minister in May 2018. See Compl. at 1-2 (page numbers designated by ECF). In so doing, plaintiff asserts, see id. at 3-4, Kerry engaged in espionage in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 793(e), conspiracy in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, made false statements in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001, and violated the Logan Act, see 18 U.S.C. § 953. Plaintiff demands compensatory and punitive damages. Compl. at 4.

The Court dismisses the complaint because the statues on which plaintiff relies do not allow for a private right of action. See Strunk v. N.Y. Province of the Soc'y of Jesus, No. 10-5091, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 20876, at *2 (D.C. Cir. Oct. 5, 2010) (per curiam) ("To the extent appellant attempts to assert a claim under 18 U.S.C. §§ 951-960, these criminal statutes do not provide a private cause of action."); West v. Mnuchin, No. 17-1129, 2017 WL 4765724, at *1 (D.D.C. July 19, 2017) (dismissing claim against Secretary of the Treasury under 18 U.S.C. § 1001 because this "criminal statute . . . does not provide for a private right of action"); Rice v. Holder, 898 F. Supp. 2d 291, 293 (D.D.C. 2012) (finding that "the federal criminal conspiracy statute plaintiff has cited, 18 U.S.C. § 371, provides [no] private right of action against individuals"); Prunte v. Universal Music Group, 484 F. Supp. 2d 32, 42 (D.D.C. 2007) (citing Cort v. Ash, 422 U.S. 66, 79-80 (1975)) ("[I]n the criminal context, the Supreme Court has refused to imply a private right of action in 'a bare criminal statute.'"). Accordingly, the Court dismisses the complaint and issues an order separately.

/s/

AMY BERMAN JACKSON

United States District Judge DATE: July 6, 2018


Summaries of

Ackers v. Kerry

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Jul 6, 2018
Civil Action No. 18-1296 (UNA) (D.D.C. Jul. 6, 2018)
Case details for

Ackers v. Kerry

Case Details

Full title:GREGORY ACKERS, Plaintiff, v. JOHN KERRY, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Date published: Jul 6, 2018

Citations

Civil Action No. 18-1296 (UNA) (D.D.C. Jul. 6, 2018)