From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ackerman v. Berkowitz

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Aug 28, 2019
175 A.D.3d 641 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

2017–07372 Index No. 14997/15

08-28-2019

David ACKERMAN, Appellant, v. Sarah BERKOWITZ, etc., et al., Respondents.

David Ackerman, Brooklyn, NY, appellant pro se. Lee M. Nigen, Lake Success, NY, for respondents.


David Ackerman, Brooklyn, NY, appellant pro se.

Lee M. Nigen, Lake Success, NY, for respondents.

LEONARD B. AUSTIN, J.P., ROBERT J. MILLER, BETSY BARROS, ANGELA G. IANNACCI, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER In an action, inter alia, pursuant to RPAPL article 15 to quiet title to real property, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Paul Wooten, J.), dated April 10, 2017. The order denied the plaintiff's motion, inter alia, to vacate an order of the same court dated April 18, 2016, granting the defendants' cross motion to dismiss the complaint, upon the plaintiff's failure to appear at oral argument.

ORDERED that the order dated April 10, 2017, is affirmed, with costs.

In order to vacate his default in appearing for oral argument on April 18, 2016, the plaintiff was required to demonstrate both a reasonable excuse for his failure to appear and a potentially meritorious cause of action (see CPLR 5015[a][1] ; Option One Mtge. Corp. v. Rose, 164 A.D.3d 1251, 82 N.Y.S.3d 116 ). The plaintiff's motion to vacate his default was addressed to the sound discretion of the Supreme Court (see New Century Mtge. Corp. v. Chimmiri, 146 A.D.3d 893, 894, 45 N.Y.S.3d 209 ).

We agree with the Supreme Court's determination denying that branch of the plaintiff's motion which was to vacate his default in appearing for oral argument. The plaintiff failed to offer a reasonable excuse for failing to appear on April 18, 2016, and failed to demonstrate a potentially meritorious cause of action (see Wachovia Mtge., FSB v. Coleman, 170 A.D.3d 1244, 97 N.Y.S.3d 130 ; Ki Tae Kim v. Bishop, 156 A.D.3d 776, 67 N.Y.S.3d 655 ).

The plaintiff's remaining contentions are without merit.

AUSTIN, J.P., MILLER, BARROS and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ackerman v. Berkowitz

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Aug 28, 2019
175 A.D.3d 641 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

Ackerman v. Berkowitz

Case Details

Full title:David Ackerman, appellant, v. Sarah Berkowitz, etc., et al., respondents.

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

Date published: Aug 28, 2019

Citations

175 A.D.3d 641 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
105 N.Y.S.3d 703
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 6375

Citing Cases

Maya Assurance Co. v. Long Sheng Zheng

To obtain relief from his default pursuant to CPLR 5015(a)(1), the appellant was required to show both a…

Halvatzis v. Perrone

To vacate her default in opposing the defendants' motion, inter alia, to dismiss the complaint, the plaintiff…