From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ackerly v. Ackerly

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jun 21, 1974
296 So. 2d 66 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)

Opinion

No. 73-1004.

June 21, 1974.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Sarasota County, Frank Schaub, J.

Robert J. Elkins, of Lee McGill, Sarasota, for appellant.

C. Eugene Jones, of Ginsburg, Ross, Dent Byrd, Sarasota, for appellee.


Appellant filed a petition to modify final judgment of divorce awarding child support and alimony on the ground that appellee, since the final judgment, has become employed and is capable of supporting herself. Appellant also contends that the children of the parties are now over 18 years of age, employed full time and are self-supporting.

The trial court ordered appellant to continue making child support payments for the 18 year old son for a period of nine months and to continue making the alimony payments. Appellant also contests the awarding of attorney fees to appellee's attorney.

As to the continuation of alimony payments, the trial court correctly considered all of the factors set forth in Scott v. Scott, Fla.App.2d 1973, 285 So.2d 423. Therefore, we cannot say that the lower court abused its discretion in denying the motion to modify the alimony.

As to child support, the testimony revealed that the 18 year old child, though employed, was terminating his employment to further his education. As was held in Field v. Field, Fla.App.2d 1974, 291 So.2d 654, the mere fact that the child has reached the age of majority of 18 is not retroactive and does not terminate the pre-existing rights of the child.

We have considered the question as to the granting of attorney fees and find appellant's contention to be without merit.

Affirmed.

MANN, C.J., and BOARDMAN, J., concur.


Summaries of

Ackerly v. Ackerly

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jun 21, 1974
296 So. 2d 66 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)
Case details for

Ackerly v. Ackerly

Case Details

Full title:JAMES WESTBROOK ACKERLY, APPELLANT, v. DEE GLANCE ACKERLY, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jun 21, 1974

Citations

296 So. 2d 66 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)

Citing Cases

Rudnick v. Solomon

We reverse the provision of the trial court's order cutting off support for Lawrence Solomon, and reinstate…

Nevins v. Nevins

This statute being prospective in application and having no impact on obligations existing prior to the…