Acevedo v. Pima County Adult Probation Department

1 Citing case

  1. Ringer v. Banner Univ. Med. Ctr.

    No. 1 CA-CV 17-0193 (Ariz. Ct. App. Feb. 6, 2018)   Cited 1 times

    3. State claims¶18 Ringer argues that the trial court erred by finding that Banner and the physicians were entitled to judicial immunity and were also entitled to notices of claim that Ringer failed to timely file. Under judicial immunity, judges are not liable for damages for their judicial acts. Acevedo by Acevedo v. Pima Cty. Adult Prob. Dep't, 142 Ariz. 319, 321 (1984). Judicial immunity has been expanded to protect mental health professionals who have been appointed by the court to assist in a judicial process.