From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ace Prop. v. Federal-Mogul

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 30, 2008
55 A.D.3d 479 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

October 30, 2008.

Orders, Supreme Court, New York County (Herman Cahn, J.), entered November 1, 2007, which, in a declaratory judgment action involving plaintiff insurers' coverage obligations for bodily injury claims arising out of alleged exposure to asbestoscontaining products that were manufactured, sold or distributed by defendants-respondents' predecessor in interest, insofar as appealed from, granted the motions of defendants Federal-Mogul Corporation and Federal-Mogul Products, Inc. (Federal-Mogul) and Magnetek, Inc. to stay the action to abide an action in New Jersey involving the same subject matter and many of the same parties, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Before: Lippman, P.J., Mazzarelli, Williams, Buckley and Renwick, JJ.


The insurers fail to show that the first-filed New Jersey action is vexatious, oppressive or was instituted to obtain some unjust advantage, that New York's interests in this dispute predominate over New Jersey's, or other reason for deviating from the generally followed first-in-time rule ( see White Light Prods, v On The Scene Prods., 231 AD2d 90, 96-97), under which "the court which has first taken jurisdiction is the one in which the matter should be determined and it is a violation of the rules of comity to interfere" ( id. at 96 [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]). We have considered the insurers ` other arguments and find them unavailing.


Summaries of

Ace Prop. v. Federal-Mogul

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 30, 2008
55 A.D.3d 479 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

Ace Prop. v. Federal-Mogul

Case Details

Full title:ACE PROPERTY CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Plaintiffs, and ALLSTATE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 30, 2008

Citations

55 A.D.3d 479 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
866 N.Y.S.2d 188

Citing Cases

Space Race LLC v. Ala. Space Sci. Exhibit Comm'n

ASSEC provides no reason to deviate from the first-in-time-filed rule. It proffers no evidence to show that…