From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

AC Baumgartner v. Brachfeld Law Grp. PC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Nov 30, 2011
No. CV-11-1283-PHX-FJM (D. Ariz. Nov. 30, 2011)

Opinion

No. CV-11-1283-PHX-FJM

11-30-2011

AC Baumgartner, Plaintiff, v. Brachfeld Law Group PC, Defendant.


ORDER

The court has before it plaintiff's motion for leave to file an amended complaint (doc. 14). Defendant has not responded to the motion and the time for doing so has expired.

Plaintiff filed his complaint on June 28, 2011 against Brachfeld Law Group, alleging violations under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692. Plaintiff alleges that on September 30, 2011, after filing his complaint, defendant placed a phone call to plaintiff directly, attempting to negotiate a settlement, notwithstanding defendant's knowledge that plaintiff was represented by counsel. Plaintiff now seeks leave to amend the complaint to add an additional violation of 15 U.S.C. § 1692c(a)(2) of the FDCPA, which prohibits a debt collector from communicating with a consumer who is represented by counsel with respect to such debt.

IT IS ORDERED GRANTING plaintiff's motion for leave to amend (doc. 14). The clerk is instructed to file the lodged amended complaint.

Frederick J. Martone

United States District Judge


Summaries of

AC Baumgartner v. Brachfeld Law Grp. PC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Nov 30, 2011
No. CV-11-1283-PHX-FJM (D. Ariz. Nov. 30, 2011)
Case details for

AC Baumgartner v. Brachfeld Law Grp. PC

Case Details

Full title:AC Baumgartner, Plaintiff, v. Brachfeld Law Group PC, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Date published: Nov 30, 2011

Citations

No. CV-11-1283-PHX-FJM (D. Ariz. Nov. 30, 2011)