From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Abreu v. Caviness

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 7, 2015
Case No. 1:15-cv-01085-AWI-JLT (PC) (E.D. Cal. Dec. 7, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 1:15-cv-01085-AWI-JLT (PC)

12-07-2015

TAI EDMUND FRED ABREU, Plaintiff, v. CAVINESS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND

(Doc. 15)

Plaintiff, Tai Edmund Fred Abreu, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 which he filed on July 14, 2015. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On November 5, 2015, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations which was served on Plaintiff and contained notice that Objections to the Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. Plaintiff filed an Objection on November 30, 2015.

In his objections, Plaintiff argues that he never requested injunctive relief and that he has no safety concerns. However, since Plaintiff was requesting an order to compel prison employees to produce a copy of his certified trust account statement, his motion was properly construed as requesting injunctive relief -- over which the Court lacks jurisdiction. It is, however, noted that the recommendation to forward a copy of the Findings and Recommendation to the Warden's office and the Litigation Coordinator at High Desert State Prison so "they might be made aware of Plaintiff's safety concerns" was in error. It is both reasonable and in Plaintiff's favor for the Warden's office and the Litigation Coordinator be made aware of so as to be able to correct the issue that is causing Plaintiff to have difficulty obtaining the requisite document to support his request to be allowed to proceed in forma pauperis, but the recommendation should not have included the word "safety" as Plaintiff raised no safety/security issues in his motion.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed on November 5, 2015 is adopted in full;

2. Plaintiff's motion seeking to compel the prison to produce a certified copy of his trust account statement, filed on November 2, 2015 (Doc. 14), is denied; and

3. The Clerk's Office is directed to forward a copy of this order, the Findings and Recommendation that issued on November 5, 2015 (Doc. 15), and Plaintiff's motion (Doc. 14) to the Warden's office and to Litigation Coordinator at High Desert State Prison via facsimile transfer that they might be made aware of the difficulty Plaintiff is experiencing in obtaining a certified copy of his trust account statement.
IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 7, 2015

/s/_________

SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Abreu v. Caviness

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 7, 2015
Case No. 1:15-cv-01085-AWI-JLT (PC) (E.D. Cal. Dec. 7, 2015)
Case details for

Abreu v. Caviness

Case Details

Full title:TAI EDMUND FRED ABREU, Plaintiff, v. CAVINESS, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Dec 7, 2015

Citations

Case No. 1:15-cv-01085-AWI-JLT (PC) (E.D. Cal. Dec. 7, 2015)