From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Abrams v. Rogers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jul 13, 1993
195 A.D.2d 349 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

July 13, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Diane Lebedeff, J.).


In this action for breach of fiduciary duties owed by general partners to limited partners (see, 173 A.D.2d 420), although the complaint includes demands for legal, declaratory and equitable relief in each cause of action, the central focus is whether defendants had the right to make certain payments on behalf of the partnership, and not on the amount expended. Thus, the accounting is merely a method to determine the amount of the monetary damages (see, Cadwalader Wickersham Taft v. Spinale, 177 A.D.2d 315, 316). The equitable affirmative defenses, too, are primarily incidental to the defenses at law. We have considered plaintiffs' remaining arguments and find them to be without merit.

Concur — Milonas, J.P., Rosenberger, Kupferman and Ross, JJ.


Summaries of

Abrams v. Rogers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jul 13, 1993
195 A.D.2d 349 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Abrams v. Rogers

Case Details

Full title:EDITH ABRAMS et al., Appellants, v. NATHAN R. ROGERS et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jul 13, 1993

Citations

195 A.D.2d 349 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
600 N.Y.S.2d 223

Citing Cases

Le Bel v. Donovan

Moreover, the foregoing proscription does not apply to actions where equitable relief is sought, since…

Khan v. Garg

Plaintiff's derivative claim may be tried by a jury. (Abrams v Rogers, 1992 WL 12664210, *1 [Sup Ct, NY…