From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Abramoff v. Federal Insurance Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 19, 1975
48 A.D.2d 676 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)

Opinion

May 19, 1975


In an action against an insurer, based upon its alleged failure to take reasonable steps to effectuate the settlement of a claim, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated December 3, 1974, which denied its motion for summary judgment. Order affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements. The affidavits submitted in support of the motion could have been submitted at the time of defendant's first motion for summary judgment. The portions of the deposition of the plaintiff's testator, included in the affidavit of defendant's claims manager, presents no truly new factual material. We discourage "successive motions for summary judgment, each based upon new factual assertions and proofs which were available to the movant from the outset" (Powell v Trans-Auto Systems, 32 A.D.2d 650). Rabin, Acting P.J., Hopkins, Latham, Christ and Shapiro, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Abramoff v. Federal Insurance Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 19, 1975
48 A.D.2d 676 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)
Case details for

Abramoff v. Federal Insurance Company

Case Details

Full title:DORA ABRAMOFF, as Executrix of NATANIEL ABRAMOFF, Deceased, Respondent, v…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 19, 1975

Citations

48 A.D.2d 676 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)

Citing Cases

Vinar v. Litman

56 A.D.3d 502, 502, 867 N.Y.S.2d 527;see Coccia v. Liotti, 101 A.D.3d at 666, 956 N.Y.S.2d 63;Alaimo v.…

Williams v. Sinclair

Notwithstanding plaintiffs assertion that they are "renewing" their motion, the Court finds that plaintiff's…